1967 and 68 droop

[Greg]

I have seen a number of cars, original and restored that the rear end is lower than the front.  Were they like that from the factory or the result of springs loosing some curve?

[JD]

To my understanding '67's (GT350 and GT500) were a bit higher in the front when new, and yes their rear springs are known to loose their arch over time.

[roddster]

  Caused by jumping all over Chebbys

[Rodster-500]

I have seen a number of cars, original and restored that the rear end is lower than the front.  Were they like that from the factory or the result of springs loosing some curve?

From the factory....